首页> 外文OA文献 >Opinions of Tutors and Students about Effectiveness of PBL in Dokuz Eylul University School of Medicine
【2h】

Opinions of Tutors and Students about Effectiveness of PBL in Dokuz Eylul University School of Medicine

机译:Dokuz Eylul大学医学院的导师和学生对PBL有效性的意见

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Introduction: The aim of this study is to determine the opinions of tutors and students about the effectiveness of Problem-based Learning in Dokuz Eylul University School of Medicine.Methods: A questionnaire with a five-point Likert scale, with 1:minimum, 5;maximum, rating PBL effectiveness was administered in February and March of 2001 to tutors and students. Response rates of tutors and students were respectively 65.0% (130 out of 201) and 82.4% (346 out of 420). The reliability of the scale was high (Cronbach ?= 0.90).Results: Ratings of tutors and students respectively on identified outcomes of PBL varied between 3.80-4.69 and 3.69-4.27 out of 5 points. Both groups gave high ratings to the areas of clinical reasoning, communication and problem solving and gave lower ratings to gaining basic science knowledge. Basic science tutors rated the areas of problem solving, gaining basic science knowledge and intrinsic motivation of students significantly higher than did clinical science tutors.Discussion: According to the results of this study, tutors` and students` opinions about PBL outcomes were similar to those previously reported in the literature. Both groups had positive opinions about PBL’s effectiveness. As has been reported in other studies, tutors and students gave the lowest ratings to the area of gaining basic science knowledge. However, the ratings of basic science tutors were higher than those of clinical science tutors in this area. This may be due to pre-existing beliefs of clinical science tutors regarding the effectiveness of PBL for teaching factual basic science knowledge.
机译:简介:本研究旨在确定教师和学生对Dokuz Eylul大学医学院基于问题的学习的有效性的意见。方法:采用李克特五点量表的问卷,比例为1:最低,5最大程度地评估PBL的有效性是在2001年2月和3月对导师和学生进行的。导师和学生的回应率分别为65.0%(201名中的130)和82.4%(420名中的346)。量表的信度很高(Cronbach = 0.90)。结果:在确定的PBL结局中,辅导老师和学生的评分分别在3.80-4.69和3.69-4.27之间(满分5分)。两组均在临床推理,交流和解决问题方面给予较高的评价,而对获得基础科学知识的评价较低。基础科学导师对问题解决领域,获得基础科学知识和学生内在动力的领域的评价大大高于临床科学导师。讨论:根据这项研究的结果,教师和学生对PBL结果的看法相似。以前在文献中报道过。两组都对PBL的成效持积极态度。正如其他研究报道的那样,在获得基础科学知识方面,辅导员和学生的评分最低。但是,该领域的基础科学导师的评分高于临床科学导师的评分。这可能是由于临床科学导师先前关于PBL在教授事实基础科学知识方面的有效性的信念所致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号